高途留学为大家整理了GMAT逻辑题OG解析，帮助大家备考GMAT逻辑考试，来看看吧。

In Stenland, many workers have been complaining that they cannot survive on minimum wage, the lowest wage an employer is permitted to pay. The government is proposing to raise the minimum wage. Many employers who pay their workers the current minimum wage argue that if it is raised, unemployment will increase because they will no longer be able to afford to employ as many workers.
Which of the following, if true in Stenland, most strongly supports the claim that raising the minimum wage there will not have the effects that the employers predict?

A、For any position with wages below a living wage, the difficulty of finding and retaining employees adds as much to employment costs as would raising wages.

B、Raising the minimum wage does not also increase the amount employers have to contribute in employee benefits.

C、When inflation is taken into account, the proposed new minimum wage is not as high as the current one was when it was introduced.

D、Many employees currently being paid wages at the level of the proposed new minimum wage will demand significant wage increases.

E、Many employers who pay some workers only the minimum wage also pay other workers wages that are much higher than the minimum.

原文逻辑：很多工人抱怨最低工资不够生活，因此政府打算去增加最低工资。但是现在这些给员工发最低工资的雇主们却说如果最低工资上涨了，那么失业率就会上涨因为这些雇主是支付不起的。（即工资涨了之后，雇主支付不起可能会有员工被裁掉）

说明增加最低工资并不会出现雇主们说的情况，即削弱雇主观点

A. 对于无法满足基本生活的工资，寻找并且留下这些员工的成本和提高工资带来的成本增加是差不多的。说明对于这些付最低工资的雇主来说，现在支付的人工成本和涨工资后要支付的人工成本是一样的，那就不存在说涨工资后支付不起的情况了，观点不成立。

B. 最低工资的上涨不需要雇主再去提高员工福利，无关选项，只能说明雇主不需要再增加其他成本而已，但是无法weaken雇主观点

C. 如果考虑到通货膨胀，将要涨的最低工资还没有我们现在这个最低工资当初被引入实行时那么高，这是一个很容易读错的干扰选项，很多同学理解的是考虑通货膨胀后，涨价后的还没现在高，其实不是这个意思，说的是当通货膨胀后，涨价后的还没曾经实行最低工资时的工资高。这里就是个无关比较了，我们不需要和曾经的最低工资比，而且我们也不知道曾经的最低工资和现在谁低谁高。

D. 很多现在就已经拿了和涨价后最低工资一样水平的员工之后会要求涨薪。更加体现雇主的成本可能要变更高了，无关。

E. 很多员工给部分员工支付最低工资，给其他员工支付远比最低工资更高的工资。完全无关，还是无法体现涨工资的影响，直接排除。