托福范文的积累对于托福写作考试很重要，高途留学为大家整理了托福考试题目的相关范文，今天来看看托福写作范文:是否给飞机污染征税。

托福写作范文:是否给飞机污染征税

题目回忆还原:

Your professor is teaching a class onenvironmental science. Write a post respondingto the professor's question.

In your response, you should do the following。

Express and support your opinion.

Make a contribution to the discussion inyour own words.

An effective response will contain at least 100words.

This week, we'll be discussing ways to address airDollution. One idea is introducine environmentaltaxes on air travel. Such taxes, also referred to asecoloeical taxes or ereen taxes. are extra chareesthat eet added to the price of airplane tickets.Money collected from these taxes could beinvested in environmentally friendlv technolociesorin promoting other. cleaner modes oftransportation. Do you think there should be anenvironmental tax on air travel? Whv or why not?

Andrew:We should impose environmental taxes on air travel. Thesetaxes might encourage people to find cheaper, more eco-friendly ways to get places. In my country, many people useolanes to fly a short distance because fliehts are relativelycheap, when they could just as easily take a less polluting form of transportation.

Claire:Additional taxes on air travel will do little to solve the problemof air pollution. Airplane tickets would become moreexpensive punishine passeneers without incentivizine airlinetto become more environmentally friendly, The airlines shoulopay the price to protect the environment, not their customers.

题目讲解：

1.是否要给飞机征税。目的是为了减少空气污染。可以分析的是，给飞机征税的好坏结果，和是否真的能达到减少空气污染的目的。

2.可行的思路:

飞机征税，增加人们负担，所以人们会选择做火车，减少直接排向空气的污染。

这个思路稍难，需要一点语料和背景常识。

- Money collected from these taxes could be invested in environmentally friendly technologies orin promoting other cleaner modes of transportation。如：高铁确实很方便，排污少，也满足了人们出行的需求。值得政府去投资。问题是高铁如何写?

答案是: high-speed rail

不同意：飞机征税并不会给很多人减少人们坐飞机，因为也不会减少空气污染，因为坐机的主要人群是中产阶级和富豪，征税，并不会给他们增加明显的负担，就像即便是私人飞机出行价格不菲，但是仍然有很多富人乐此不疲。反而伤害了普通民众。(比如之前卡戴珊家族的Kelly，因仅17分钟私人飞机出行被媒体炮轰)，飞机征税会给普通民众和国家都带来经济负担。飞机因为快捷，方便，成为很多普通民众旅游的选择，如果征税，就会加重这些人的经济负担其次，也会影响相关旅游业的发展。

相同而言，不同意的思路比较生活化，大家都有语料，反而好写一些。

参考范文:

I agree with Andrew that imposing green taxes on air travel is wise for governments. This can effectively curp the air polution caused bairolane emissions.As we know, airplanes not only emit tons of toxic gases, known as the culprits of alobal warming, but also dischargethem directly into the upper atmosphere. There's no wind to blow those harmful gases away or rain to wash them off in the upperatmosphere, thus air travel causes more serious harm to the atosphere than other modes of transportation like trains or buses. Byimposing hicher taxes on air travel and raising the price of air tickets, governments can encourage more responsible choices. in Swedenor instance, the introduction of an aviation tax ed to a decrease in air travel and an increase in train usage. Many would thinkwice before purchasing tickets, as no one likes those high price coming from their wallets. With fewer people choosing air travel, thepollution it causes will diminish correspondingly. ln conclusion, governments should enact this policy, as demonstrated by successfulexamples, to help alleviate the pollution caused by airplanes. (185字)